Nudds et al Review(Reviewed by Roy Johnston in the Irish Times circa December 1988) Science in Ireland 1800-1930: Tradition and Reform (ed J R Nudds et al); TCD Physics Dept; £10 Scientists in Ireland have an ongoing identity crisis, unlike the literary Irish, whose international recognition is usually unquestioned, even when, like Shaw or Beckett, they make their careers abroad. Visitors from abroad however usually express surprise when they discover that (for example) Hamilton or Tyndall were Irish. This question is addressed in a modest preface by the editorial group, which also includes Dr N D McMillan of Carlow RTC, Professor D L Weaire of TCD and Professor S M P McKenna-Lawlor of Maynooth, from which I quote: "....why did Ireland, in those days more distant in practical terms from Britain and Europe, produce so many notable figures in the history of science? The question is at least as significant as its much discussed literary equivalent with which there is, no doubt, some subtle connection...". This book is the proceedings of a symposium on the history of science in Ireland which took place in TCD in March 1986; it has been published with support from the TCD Physics, Applied Mathematics and Engineering Departments, from St Patricks College Maynooth, and from private sources. It is therefore not to be regarded as a complete and integrated study of the subject in the period, as is perhaps suggested by the title. It is more a signal to scholars that here is an area worth developing, in the context of ongoing historical study of the emergence of modern Irish nationhood. There are 17 papers, of which 11 are from Ireland and the remainder from abroad. Of the 17, 11 are by working scientists who have taken up, usually at the margin of other activities, an interest in the history of their discipline. The remaining 6 are by professional scientific historians with scientific backgrounds; all these are from abroad. Readers will find it of interest to compare the contributions from these two groups, bearing in mind that the history of science in an emerging nation has two distinct aspects: on the one hand, the contribution to understanding within the discipline, and on the other hand the contribution of scientific and technical competence to the development of a national economy, and the synthesis of a national identity. The book falls into three sections: mathematics, astronomy and experimental science. Contributions from abroad tend to fall into the mathemnatics area; there is some concentration on the relationship between research and teaching, on the influence of the French mathematical revolution, and on practical 'hand and eye' instruction. One can see national politics lurking in the French connection; this is a vein needing to be exploited within the the paradigms of Irish national historiography, as indeed is the role of people like McCullagh, who stood in the 1847 election, lost and then committed suicide. Names having primary attention in this section, apart from McCullagh (Prof T D Spearman) are Boole (Prof Des McHale) and Hamilton (Sean O'Donnell). Biographical attitudes towards the nationality of G G Stokes and William Thomson (better known as Lord Kelvin) are analysed by Dr Frank James of the Royal Institution, somewhat inconclusively. In the astronomy section Professor Susan McKenna-Lawlor catalogues the observatories which were active in the period; apart from Dunsink, Armagh and Birr Castle there were some half-dozen lesser-known centres of significance, usually run by gentleman-amateurs. Professor P A Wayman of Dunsink writes on its foundation and the work of Brinkley. The scientific background, and the technology involved in the construction, of the great Birr Castle telescope are outlined by Dr J A Bennett of the Cambridge Dept of History and Philosophy of Science; this is usefully supplemented by a practical reconstruction of the instrumentation used by Lord Rosse in the measurement of lunar temperature (David Taylor and Mary McGuckian, TCD Dept of Mechanical Engineering). The experimental science section has two contributions from Dr J G O'Hara (who is working in the Leibniz Archiv, Hannover), one on Humphrey Lloyd (who cultivated an extensive network abroad in relation to the measurement of the earth's magnetism) and the other on the correspondence between Hertz and Fitzgerald. This was in connection with the verification of the Maxwell theory of electromagnetic wave propagation, which is at the root of all modern radio communication, a key frontier area of physics at the time. The three world centres for the development of electrodynamics at the end of the 19th century were Berlin (Helmholz), Cambridge (Maxwell) and Dublin (Fitzgerald). The work of O'Hara in establishing the international standing of Irish-based science in the 19th century is helping to lay the foundation for the future approaches to Irish history which are needed to give Irish science the place it deserves. Other contributions in this section are on Samuel Haughton and the age of the earth (Norman McMillan), John Joly on colour photography, radioactivity and (again) the age of the earth (John Nudds), the transatlantic cable (Dr D de Cogan, from the Nottingham Engineering School), and two biographical studies: Mary Ward (microscopist 1827-1869, by Dr Owen Harry of QUB) and Robert Woods (biophysicist 1865-1938, by Professor C S Breathnach of UCD). In conclusion it is appropriate to recall the booklet 'People and Places in Irish Science and Technology', edited by Charles Mollan and others for the Royal Irish Academy and published in 1985 in connection with the Academy bicentenary. This has one or two pages of a sketch for each of a much larger number of people, including technologists like Harry Ferguson and Howard Grubb. Extend the analysis of the lives and times of those featuring in the Academy booklet to the depth of the book under review, and you already have several weighty volumes. Full biographical treatments, at the level received by Hamiltion, would fill a shelf. Why is this important? I suggest that it is because in the history of science and technology in Ireland we have a unique laboratory within which can be analysed the tensions between the fundamental internationalism of science and the conflicting technological needs of the imperial State, in competition with those of the emerging embryonic nation. Overlay this with the cultural tensions arising from religious pluralism within the emerging Irish nation, and we begin to see a web of fascinating but possibly frightening complexity. No wonder traditional political, economic and social historians have shied away from it. Yet the problem will have to be addressed, if Irish experience is to be used effectively in helping to form policies for using scientific technology in the contemporary third-world development process. The present writer's outline solution, for what it is worth, is to create an academic appointment, for the study of the history of science and technology in Ireland, within a history department which is strong in economic and social history, and is alive to the need to enhance creatively the study of the nation-building process in a post-colonial situation. Do I ask the impossible? RJ 1988 (Afterword: the foregoing is an indication of the philosophical background to this Tyndall web-site; the agenda stated above is still with us. RJ March 2000) Some navigational notes: In most browsers, if you click on the 'Back' button, it will bring to to the point of departure in the document from which you came. Additional navigation options of local relevance are given at the foot of each page, thus:
|
||
|
||